This blog has been slow to get going, unfortunately, but I’m hoping to remedy that. Starting today.
The scale model project I’ve been plugging away at for about eight months now is complete … and has been since about mid-April, actually. The Four Incarnations of Davros is, true to its name, a set of four 1/8th scale, scratch-built models representing the character as he appeared in four different stories, spanning four decades:
- “Genesis of the Daleks” (1975) version, as played by Michael Wisher.
- “Resurrection of the Daleks/Revelation of the Daleks” (1984/85) version, as played by Terry Molloy.
- “Remembrance of the Daleks” (1988) Imperial version, as played by Terry Molloy.
- “The Stolen Earth/Journey’s End” (2008) version, as played by Julian Bleach.
Pics coming soon.
Today, however, I’ve decided to address a little development that is high on the minds of Doctor Who/Dalek fans everywhere: the so-called “New Paradigm” Daleks that were introduced in the episode “Victory of the Daleks.”
Here’s the skinny on the New Paradigms: they suck. In a word. And I’m not the only one who thinks so.
I believe I said this in my original post, but I’m gonna say it again: I’m pretty sure the impressive longevity of the Daleks’ appeal comes mainly from their essential timelessness, design-wise – though they’ve gone through several iterations and color schemes in their forty-seven year life span, they’ve never really changed in terms of their basic geometry (even the narrower, straight-backed “Imperial” Daleks of the ‘eighties didn’t go as far as these new abominations in rewriting the rules). They’ve never really changed because they never really had to. The design just worked. It never looked particularly “sixties” or “seventies” or “twenty-first century.” It just looked … right, somehow. Timeless.
Timeless in a way that, say, Star Trek never was. When it fell to J.J. Abrams and his team to reinvent Star Trek, legions of Trek geeks insisted they stick to the same old props, sets and ships of the “classic” Star Trek series. At least, I’m assuming they did – I have zero interest in Star Trek or what Star Trek fans think, but since I am still a geek myself, I can well imagine they’d want everything to stay the same. The movie was awesome, though, precisely because Abrams and his boys knew better – those old designs and props are so painfully dated that they’d never be able to stick them up on a big screen in this day and age and expect them to look remotely believable. Everything from the puny squirt-gun-looking phasers to the cardboard sets to the spindly-looking, toilet-paper-roll Enterprise model itself had to be re-imagined.
There was never any such pressing need to reinvent the Daleks. But even if newly installed Doctor Who producer Steven Moffat just had to assert his manhood by kicking Russel T. Davies’ bronze-and-gold Daleks to the curb, he could have picked a better successor. Out of a hat. In the dark. In fact, I think it’s fair to say a blindfolded monkey on Viagra in a room full of horny lady monkeys could have produced a better Dalek design. Not to mention the dozens of fan-designed Dalek variants that would have made a better choice (stay tuned for my own CG take on what a “new” Dalek should look like) than the clunky, lumpy, childishly designed, parti-colored pieces of crap that we all saw in “Victory.” There’s a gentleman who goes by the screen name “Mechmaster” on the Project Dalek message boards who has created an entire stable of advanced Dalek models, to name but one. The “Mark 6” as they’re called, as well as its offshoots, can be viewed here.
Oh, and be sure to take a gander at his “Second Empire” CG graphic novel - it's just slightly better than "f'ing awesome." Just remember to come back here afterwards.
But enough talk – here now is a comparison study of a ‘60’s “Dead Planet” Dalek (the very first Dalek story, as if I need to say it), a 2005 “New Series Dalek” (or NSD), and the New Paradigm Daleks from “Victory.”
First, we have the original beast from 1963, designed by Ray Cusick:
Okay, I’m feelin’ it. Nice lines. Shiny, no-nonsense silver. Just picture a creepy mutant alien inside it, half-insane with hatred and racial intolerance and claustrophobia. He’s just learned that there’s a whole world of genetically perfect blond people living an idyllic life in his backyard and, understandably, he wants to nuke the crap out of them.
Yes. We’re there.
Now let’s turn to the 2005 revamped Dalek:
Now I’m really feelin’ it. BAD-ass alien war machine. Not sure about bronze and gold as standard livery for a soldier, but it works once you get used to it. Russell T. Davies ushered in the revived Doctor Who series back in 2005, and with it came this newly updated (but not redesigned) Dalek, the construction of which was also overseen by Davies.
Russell, I say this in the nicest, most sincerely flattering way possible: for a gay guy, you really know what a bad-ass hate-filled alien war machine ought to look like.
And now ... the New Paradigm:
How about … no. Just no.
Note: the CG “Dead Planet” and NSD were created by me in the Blender open-source 3D graphics package. The New Paradigm shown is, obviously, an actual prop; shot taken from the British "Radio Times" website.
Know ye this: you will never, ever, under any circumstances, see either a virtual or styrene plastic model of a New Paradigm coming out of my workshops. Ever. I only build Daleks … and they are not Daleks. Any more than an upside-down plastic cup with a couple of straws sticking out of it is a Dalek.
It should also be noted that I have, as yet, been unable to find a decent profile view of one of these things, which is a shame because it’s only when viewed from the side that you really get a feel for just how awful the design is.
Whoops – spoke too soon:
Damn, that’s bad. Especially next to the NSD. There’s that awkward, strangely hunchbacked sort of vibe going on that front-view pics just don’t capture, with the flatly vertical gun box fronts adding to the overall sense that what we’re looking at is not really a Dalek but rather a bad caricature of one drawn by an enthusiastic but essentially unperceptive child, a drawing that has somehow been made real.
The overwhelming sense of childishness – or laziness, at the very least - is present in just about every other detail to one degree or another, from the silly accordion neck, the simplistic half-ping-pong ball dome, the black midsection “band” that resembles some piece of clunky, tacky ‘eighties home electronics (an old Atari or Sega Master System or 8-track player), the pointless, just plain messy raised panels-on-panels of the skirt section, to the fenders, which look like colossal, blocky afterthoughts.
Then you have the colors. Colorful Daleks aren’t necessarily a bad thing – I believe one of the ideas behind the redesign was to capture the feel of the bright ‘sixties movie Daleks of the two Peter Cushing films. I get that. But look at them:
Nothing subtle or inventive going on there. No sleek metallic cobalt blues, or shiny, deep reds, or yellow-golds. Just loud, obnoxious primary crayon colors. Somebody really took an interest, didn’t they?
But again, enough talk. Let’s have some more fun with pictures!
When I look at this -
- I think this:
On the other hand, when I look at this –
- I immediately think these:
Whenever I see this –
- I think of something like this:
And somehow feel that it should be labeled thusly:
And there’s no denying that this –
Well, Steven Moffat, you just had to be different, didn’t you? Just had to show everybody what a big boy you are, that you can do it all by yourself, that Russell T. Davies wasn’t calling the shots anymore. Let’s change everything – the TARDIS, the console room, the Daleks … just for shits and giggles, right?
Well, congratulations, Steve – you, your design team and your big fat ego just ruined an icon.